ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Collocated mixed reality for basic life support training in medical students: a randomised pilot feasibility trial.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulation-based basic life support (BLS) training often lacks patient-level and contextual realism. Mixed reality (MR) may enrich manikin-based simulation with virtual patient cues while preserving tactile interaction. This study evaluated the feasibility of integrating collocated MR-supported BLS training into undergraduate instruction. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, 1:1 randomised pilot feasibility trial embedded within an 8-h BLS course. First-year medical students were randomised to MR-supported or conventional training. Feasibility domains included course integration, same-day safety and technical delivery, learner-reported workload, and exploratory MR-specific usability and acceptability feedback. Secondary learner-reported outcomes included self-efficacy, situational motivation, student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. Results: Sixty-one students participated (MR Conclusions: Collocated MR-supported BLS training could be integrated into undergraduate instruction, with no evidence of higher learner-reported workload. Further refinements should precede larger evaluations of objective BLS performance, retention, and transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.