Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375646›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2026

Cross-sector deep learning scales life cycle assessment using unified textual descriptions.

Kai Zhao, Biao Luo, Xiting Peng, Zhu Deng, Peng Zhang, Chen Li, Tao Liu, Xiaonan Wang, Zhijun Gui, Shanying Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kai ZhaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Biao LuoShanghai HiQ Smart Data Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201900, China.
Xiting PengDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Zhu DengDepartment of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, China.
Peng ZhangShanghai HiQ Smart Data Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201900, China.
Chen LiShanghai HiQ Smart Data Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201900, China.
Tao LiuShanghai E-Carbon Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201900, China.
Xiaonan WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Zhijun GuiShanghai E-Carbon Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 201900, China.
Shanying HuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a foundational framework for quantifying global environmental impacts to guide decarbonization and circular economy transitions. Yet, conventional inventory compilation remains severely bottlenecked by data scarcity and intensive manual curation, with existing machine learning solutions typically confined to isolated industrial sectors rather than offering a scalable way to overcome these limitations. This fragmentation prevents pan-industrial scaling, thereby masking hidden environmental risks and hindering rapid, data-driven sustainability interventions. Here we develop LCA-TextNet, a generalizable deep learning framework that bypasses domain-specific feature engineering by predicting 25 life cycle impact indicators across 20 distinct industrial sectors directly from knowledge-based textual descriptions. Leveraging a Transformer-based architecture trained on over 16,000 datasets, the model maps high-dimensional text embeddings into uniform semantic spaces, achieving high accuracy (

Indexed as

Deep learningGeneralization performanceKnowledge-based textual descriptionsLife cycle assessment

Identifiers

PMID42375646
PMCPMC13312156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.