Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375642›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

An innovative screening method for heat stress tolerance in chickpea (

S Gurumurthy, C Laxuman, K K Hazra, K R Soren, P V V Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S GurumurthyICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Pune, Maharashtra 413115, India.
C LaxumanZonal Agricultural Research Station, Kalaburagi, Karnataka 585101, India.
K K HazraICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208024, India.
K R SorenICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834010, India.
P V V PrasadDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506, Kansas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable field phenotyping for terminal heat stress (THS) tolerance in chickpea is constrained by conventional late-sowing approaches that confound reproductive stress with reduced vegetative growth. We developed and validated a deflowering (DF)-based field screening method that selectively imposes heat stress during the reproductive phase while maintaining normal vegetative vigour. Early flowers were removed to synchronize flowering and delay reproduction by 10-15 days, exposing flowering and pod set to high temperatures (>33 °C). Across two seasons and contrasting genotypes, DF maintained vegetative growth but significantly reduced pollen viability, pod set, and yield, with tolerant genotypes showing markedly lower yield penalties than susceptible ones. The method effectively discriminated reproductive thermotolerance and provides a simple, low-cost, and biologically grounded phenotyping tool for chickpea breeding under warming climates.•A DF-based field method selectively imposes reproductive-stage heat stress without compromising vegetative growth.•The approach reliably distinguishes heat-tolerant and susceptible chickpea genotypes under natural field conditions.

Indexed as

DefloweringPhenotypingPod setPollen viabilityReproductive thermotolerance

Identifiers

PMID42375642
PMCPMC13311209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.