ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Epidemiology and Clinical Implications of Scaphoid Morphology Based on Morsy Classification.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A recent anatomical study in 2019 introduced a classification system of scaphoid morphology, characterizing dimensions, vascular patterns, and locations of nutrient vessels. This article aims to determine the prevalence of these scaphoid types in the general population. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was performed. Patients who underwent wrist imaging via 4-view wrist x-rays from January to December 2022 were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with acute scaphoid fracture or pathology. Anatomic scaphoid measurements were performed for each radiograph. Chi-squared tests and unpaired Results: Three hundred sixty-three x-rays from 345 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 291 type I patients (80.2%) and 72 type II patients (19.8%). Patients with type II scaphoids were significantly more likely to be left handed ( Conclusions: Type I scaphoids are more prevalent in the general population, 80% in this study. No clinically significant demographic or patient factor differences were found between patients with type I and II scaphoids. Future studies are warranted to determine the clinical impact of type II scaphoids and the development of scaphoid-related pathology (avascular necrosis, fractures, nonunions, etc). Type of study/level of evidence: 2c ecologic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.