ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Comparative evaluation for small molecule somatostatin 4 receptor agonists:
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The treatment of neuropathic pain with traditional and adjuvant analgesics is limited in efficacy and associated with severe adverse effects. Our group has previously shown that somatostatin, released from capsaicin-sensitive peptidergic sensory nerve terminals, mediates analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects at the peripheral and central levels via the somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (SST4). The therapeutic use of native somatostatin is limited by its numerous biological actions mediated by the five somatostatin receptors and its short elimination half-life. Therefore, the development of SST4-selective agonists may be an effective approach for treating neuropathic pain. Methods: In this comparative study, the receptor binding and activation properties of four small molecules were compared with those of somatostatin and the SST4 receptor superagonist, J-2156, through in silico drug-likeness investigation, pharmacokinetic prediction, molecular docking calculations, in vitro cAMP accumulation assays, and in vivo assessment of their antihyperalgesic effects in the partial sciatic nerve ligation mouse model of traumatic neuropathy. Results and Discussion: Docking calculations showed that all compounds interact with the conserved Asp126 of SST4, which is suggested to play a key role in ligand binding. cAMP assays confirmed that all molecules activate the SST4 receptor with comparable potency to that of J-2156. All examined compounds reversed PSNL-induced mechanical hyperalgesia. Their antihyperalgesic effects ranged from 20% to 70% and depended on both the time and the applied dose. These results suggest that the tested compounds could be potentially effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.