Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Comparative evaluation for small molecule somatostatin 4 receptor agonists:

Dóra Biskup, Minjin Ganbold, Andrea Kinga Nehr-Majoros, Valéria Tékus, Zsófia Hajna, Barbara Fülöp, Éva Szőke, Csaba Hetényi, A Michael Crider, Iman Daryaei and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dóra Biskup *Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Minjin Ganbold *Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Andrea Kinga Nehr-MajorosDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Valéria TékusDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsófia HajnaDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Barbara FülöpDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Éva SzőkeDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Csaba HetényiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
A Michael CriderDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, United States.
Iman DaryaeiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Zsuzsanna HelyesDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Rita BörzseiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Erika PintérDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Medical School & Centre for Neuroscience, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of neuropathic pain with traditional and adjuvant analgesics is limited in efficacy and associated with severe adverse effects. Our group has previously shown that somatostatin, released from capsaicin-sensitive peptidergic sensory nerve terminals, mediates analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects at the peripheral and central levels via the somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (SST4). The therapeutic use of native somatostatin is limited by its numerous biological actions mediated by the five somatostatin receptors and its short elimination half-life. Therefore, the development of SST4-selective agonists may be an effective approach for treating neuropathic pain. Methods: In this comparative study, the receptor binding and activation properties of four small molecules were compared with those of somatostatin and the SST4 receptor superagonist, J-2156, through in silico drug-likeness investigation, pharmacokinetic prediction, molecular docking calculations, in vitro cAMP accumulation assays, and in vivo assessment of their antihyperalgesic effects in the partial sciatic nerve ligation mouse model of traumatic neuropathy. Results and Discussion: Docking calculations showed that all compounds interact with the conserved Asp126 of SST4, which is suggested to play a key role in ligand binding. cAMP assays confirmed that all molecules activate the SST4 receptor with comparable potency to that of J-2156. All examined compounds reversed PSNL-induced mechanical hyperalgesia. Their antihyperalgesic effects ranged from 20% to 70% and depended on both the time and the applied dose. These results suggest that the tested compounds could be potentially effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

cAMP assaydockinghyperalgesianeuropathic painsomatostatin receptor subtype 4

Identifiers

PMID42375620
PMCPMC13311364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.