ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Safety profile of upadacitinib in inflammatory Bowel disease: a dual-source pharmacovigilance study integrating FAERS signal detection and real-world clinical cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Upadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, safety data in real-world Asian populations remain limited. This study aimed to characterize the adverse event (AE) profile of upadacitinib by integrating large-scale pharmacovigilance data with real-world clinical evidence. Methods: We conducted a dual-source analysis comprising spontaneous reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS; Q1 2018-Q3 2025) and a retrospective single-center clinical cohort in China (April 2023-September 2025). In the FAERS database, disproportionality analyses were performed using four algorithms (ROR, PRR, EBGM, and IC) to detect safety signals. In the clinical cohort, we assessed AE incidence, severity, timing, and management strategies. Subgroup analyses were descriptive, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the time to the first AE. Results: The clinical cohort included 183 patients, of whom 85 (46.4%) experienced at least one AE. The most common events were laboratory abnormalities, infections, and dermatologic conditions. Serious events, including intestinal perforation and venous thrombosis, were rare. A distinct early clustering of toxicity was observed: 38.8% of first events occurred within 30 days and 67.0% within 60 days of treatment initiation. Male reproductive safety appeared favorable; one patient experienced transient semen discoloration, which resolved following dose reduction. The FAERS analysis identified rare signals absent in the clinical cohort, notably Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and pseudostroke, highlighting potential high-risk scenarios. Signal classification revealed strong signals for herpes zoster and acne, moderate signals for venous thrombosis and laboratory abnormalities, and weak signals for rare events. AE patterns varied by age, disease type, and induction dose, consistent with the mechanistic expectations of JAK1 inhibition. Conclusion: Upadacitinib demonstrates a manageable safety profile in patients with IBD, with most AEs controllable through vigilant monitoring and individualized management. The integration of clinical cohort data with FAERS pharmacovigilance provides a comprehensive view of both common and rare risks. These findings offer critical real-world evidence from an Asian population, complementing global data to inform clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.