ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Mapping personal recovery in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an exploratory machine learning study of self-reported stage classifications.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovery in schizophrenia is a complex and multidimensional process involving functional, clinical, and psychological dimensions. This study aims to use machine learning (ML) to explore multivariate associations with classifications of personal recovery assessed with the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI). We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1,361 individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders enrolled in the French REHABase cohort, a national psychosocial rehabilitation network. Random forest models were developed using internal cross-validation on a training set and subsequently evaluated on an independent test set (70/30 split). Model performance was high in the training data (AUC = 0.997; accuracy = 94.3%) and more modest in the test set (AUC = 0.724; accuracy = 49.8%). SHAP analyses (explainable ML) were used to describe stage-associated recovery profiles based on multivariate patterns across sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Overall, the modest performance observed in the independent test set underscores the complexity of personal recovery and is consistent with partial conceptual overlap across STORI stage classifications. The Moratorium stage was characterized by higher negative self-esteem and internalized stigma, alongside lower wellbeing and positive self-esteem. Awareness was associated with mental wellbeing and negative self-esteem, with additional contributions from positive self-esteem and relational satisfaction. The Preparation stage showed less distinct profiles, with autonomy emerging as a relevant feature. Rebuilding was associated with intermediate-to-high levels of wellbeing and resilience. The Growth stage was characterized by high wellbeing, positive self-esteem, and relational satisfaction. These findings provide an integrated description of stage-associated recovery profiles and illustrate how explainable ML can be used to explore the multidimensional organization of personal recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.