Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375587›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Mapping personal recovery in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: an exploratory machine learning study of self-reported stage classifications.

Anaid Pérez-Ramos, Julien Plasse, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Benjamin Gouache, Emilie Legros-Lafarge, Nathalie Guillard-Bouhet, Nicolas Franck, Guillaume Barbalat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anaid Pérez-RamosCentre for Biomedical Research in Mental Health (CIBERSAM), ISCI-III, Madrid, Spain.
Julien PlasseCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (CRR), Hôpital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5229) et Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Isabelle Chéreau-BoudetCentre Référent Conjoint de Réhabilitation (CRCR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Benjamin GouacheCentre Référent de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (C3R), Centre Hospitalier Alpes Isère, Grenoble, France.
Emilie Legros-LafargeCentre Référent de Réhabilitation Psychosociale de Limoges (C2RL), Limoges, France.
Nathalie Guillard-BouhetCentre de REhabilitation d'Activités Thérapeutiques Intersectoriel de la Vienne (CREATIV), Centre Hospitalier Laborit, Poitiers, France.
Nicolas FranckCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (CRR), Hôpital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5229) et Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Guillaume BarbalatCentre Ressource de Réhabilitation Psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (CRR), Hôpital Le Vinatier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS UMR 5229) et Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery in schizophrenia is a complex and multidimensional process involving functional, clinical, and psychological dimensions. This study aims to use machine learning (ML) to explore multivariate associations with classifications of personal recovery assessed with the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI). We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1,361 individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders enrolled in the French REHABase cohort, a national psychosocial rehabilitation network. Random forest models were developed using internal cross-validation on a training set and subsequently evaluated on an independent test set (70/30 split). Model performance was high in the training data (AUC = 0.997; accuracy = 94.3%) and more modest in the test set (AUC = 0.724; accuracy = 49.8%). SHAP analyses (explainable ML) were used to describe stage-associated recovery profiles based on multivariate patterns across sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Overall, the modest performance observed in the independent test set underscores the complexity of personal recovery and is consistent with partial conceptual overlap across STORI stage classifications. The Moratorium stage was characterized by higher negative self-esteem and internalized stigma, alongside lower wellbeing and positive self-esteem. Awareness was associated with mental wellbeing and negative self-esteem, with additional contributions from positive self-esteem and relational satisfaction. The Preparation stage showed less distinct profiles, with autonomy emerging as a relevant feature. Rebuilding was associated with intermediate-to-high levels of wellbeing and resilience. The Growth stage was characterized by high wellbeing, positive self-esteem, and relational satisfaction. These findings provide an integrated description of stage-associated recovery profiles and illustrate how explainable ML can be used to explore the multidimensional organization of personal recovery.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandom ForestSelf ConceptSelf Reportpersonal recoveryrandom forestREHABaseschizophreniaSHAP valuessubjective recovery

Identifiers

PMID42375587
PMCPMC13310769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.