ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Navigating radiography as a larger-bodied patient: a qualitative exploration.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiographic technologies pose barriers to the care of patients with larger bodies both in medical imaging and radiotherapy. Whilst research exists on staff attitudes, there is a lack of understanding of patient experiences. Therefore, this study investigated the qualitative experiences of larger bodied adults who have attended radiographic services within the United Kingdom (UK). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed via social media. The anonymous survey collected demographic data and invited participants to describe their most impactful experience within radiographic services. Thematic analysis was conducted with three researchers agreeing the final themes. Results: Ninety-two participants completed the survey. Most respondents (98.9%) reported their experience with medical imaging, while 16.3% reported their radiotherapy experience. Responses were categorised into three time periods (pre-appointment, during and ongoing) as well as 'societal beliefs' and 'suggestions of improvements'. Example themes included 'sense of self', 'exacerbating factors' and 'emotional impacts'. The experiences of both taller and larger individuals highlighted recurrent issues in access and care received, as well as some examples of good practice. The outcomes of such experiences led to health care avoidance in some cases, with others either fearful or hopeful of their future health interactions depending on how they were treated. Discussion: This study highlights clear shortcomings in the care for patients with larger and taller bodies in radiographic services. Issues ranged from stigmatised staff attitudes to unsuitable equipment, often leaving patients feeling excluded or blamed. Impacts of poor practice and healthcare avoidance are widespread, and therefore these issues need immediate attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.