Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375579›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Use of health information from social media and health self-efficacy: a cross-sectional study.

Xiaoyu Liu, Vijaya Tamla Rai, Yi Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoyu LiuCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Vijaya Tamla RaiDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, United States.
Yi YinDepartment of Behavioral Science, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social media has become a common source for health information, yet the relationship between users' experiences with this form of digital health information and health self-efficacy remains poorly understood. This study investigates how the reported reliance on and perceived evaluative difficulty of social-media-based health information are associated with self-efficacy levels in a misinformation-prone environment. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6), a nationally representative sample of U. S. adults ( Results: Approximately 27% of respondents reported complete health self-efficacy. Multivariable analysis showed that individuals who strongly disagreed with using social media information for health decisions were significantly more likely to report high self-efficacy (OR = 1.37, Conclusion: Health self-efficacy is associated with selective non-reliance on social-media-based health information for decision making and perceived evaluative ease. These patterns are consistent with Social Cognitive Theory, which emphasizes the role of perceived competence in shaping confidence beliefs. Although causal direction cannot be established, the findings suggest that public health efforts may benefit from supporting digital health literacy and critical evaluative confidence may be relevant to strengthening confidence in health management within increasingly complex digital information environments.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationSelf EfficacySocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDigital HealthDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposureMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdigital health literacyhealth information seekinghealth managementhealth self-efficacyHINTS 6misinformationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42375579
PMCPMC13311010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.