ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Conservative Retention of Pre-Existing Dental Implants Contralateral to Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Maxillary Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A 4-Year Follow-Up Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental implant survival after high-dose head-and-neck radiotherapy (RT) is uncertain, and whether to explant pre-existing implants before RT remains controversial. Case: A 58-year-old man with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of the left hard palate involving the maxilla (pT4a pN2c M0) underwent left maxillectomy with bilateral neck dissection. Two right-sided contralateral maxillary implants and three mandibular implants were retained. Adjuvant RT was delivered using IMRT/IGRT to a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions to the surgical bed. Outcome: During 4 years of follow-up with clinical examinations and panoramic radiographs, there was no clinical evidence of peri-implantitis, implant mobility, or radiographic evidence of progressive peri-implant bone loss around the retained implants. According to the RT treatment plan, the estimated radiation dose was 61.7 Gy at the contralateral maxillary implant sites and 29.2 Gy at the mandibular implant sites. The patient later developed an unrelated supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma treated with RT; the retained implants remained clinically stable. Conclusion: This case suggests that clinically healthy pre-existing implants may not require routine explantation before adjuvant RT, even when implant-site radiation exposure is substantial. Conservative retention should be accompanied by close clinical and radiographic surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.