ArticleCase reports in dermatology
Dapsone for Treatment of a Neutrophilic Predominant Variant of Polymorphous Light Eruption: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Polymorphous light eruption (PMLE) is a self-limiting immunologically mediated photodermatitis that results in the eruption of pruritic lesions hours to days after sun exposure. Case Presentation: The case presented here highlights the clinical presentation of a 39-year-old Caucasian male with an itchy, blistering rash affecting the chest, abdomen, arms, and legs. History and examination findings were suggestive of a neutrophil predominant variant of PMLE. The rash was evaluated through laboratory testing, potassium hydroxide (KOH) microscopy, wound culture, and punch biopsy. The hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain results from the biopsy demonstrated eosinophilic and neutrophilic spongiosis. Various therapeutic modalities were explored in the treatment of this patient including topical steroids, oral steroids, oral antifungals, and oral antihistamines with a lack of remission of the symptoms. Due to the persistent nature of the rash and neutrophil predominance visualized on H&E, dapsone was begun with eventual cessation of symptoms and resolution of the rash. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of scrutinizing the underlying pathophysiology of a patient's symptoms despite variations in the suspected clinical picture for effective management of symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.