ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Comparison of palpation and ultrasonography findings in supraspinous ligaments of horses.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of palpation as a diagnostic tool for supraspinous ligament injuries in horses. Diagnosis of SSL injuries typically relies on a combination of clinical examination and ultrasonographic findings. To the authors' knowledge, no previous studies have specifically investigated palpation as a diagnostic measure for these injuries. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 126 horses resented to the University Veterinary Teaching Hospital for back pathology. Inclusion criteria required horses to have a documented descriptive palpatory finding of the dorsal midline and a corresponding ultrasonographic examination of the SSL performed during the same visit. Palpable findings, including swelling, pain, temperature differences, and other abnormalities, were recorded. The location of ultrasonographic findings was categorized as either the thoracic or lumbar spine. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated and analyzed. Results: The study concluded that palpation is a highly sensitive but less specific method for assessing signs associated with supraspinous ligament pathology. It was found to be particularly useful for detecting swelling in the supraspinous ligament area of the thoracic spine. Discussion: As a sensitive method, a positive palpatory finding can indicate the possibility of SSL injury and warrants further ultrasonographic investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.