Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375495›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2026

Assessment of food safety knowledge and hygiene practices among poultry butchers in Chennai and its public health implications.

Ganesh Janarthanan, Vigneshvaran Paramasivam, Kumaravel Papaiyan, Aravindh Babu Ramasamy Parthiban, Guillaume Fournié, Damer P Blake, Fiona M Tomley, Azhahianambi Palavesam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ganesh Janarthanan *Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India.
Vigneshvaran Paramasivam *Madras Veterinary College, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India.
Kumaravel PapaiyanVeterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Udumalpet, Tamil Nadu 642 205 India.
Aravindh Babu Ramasamy ParthibanTranslational Research Platform for Veterinary Biologicals, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India.
Guillaume FourniéRoyal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, London, UK.
Damer P BlakeRoyal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, London, UK.
Fiona M TomleyRoyal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, London, UK.
Azhahianambi Palavesam *Translational Research Platform for Veterinary Biologicals, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 051 India.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-6767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chicken meat is common in human diets in Tamil Nadu, India, and poultry butchers play a vital role in food safety and prevention of meat-borne diseases. To assess food safety knowledge and hygiene practices among butchers, a survey was conducted from November 2022 to July 2023. A randomly selected panel of 375 poultry butchers was identified and interviewed from organized meat shops distributed across Chennai city, Tamil Nadu. The respondents were selected based on their active role in the slaughtering and butchering process. The survey revealed the slaughtering and butchering performed by males (100%), which indicate significant gender bias, although women accounted for 16%, of the shop ownership. The majority of the respondents were young adults (20-30 years) and had undergone elementary education (62%), with an average experience (10-15 years) of poultry meat handling (65%); they have not attended any formal biosecurity training (93%). Despite the lack of training, 79% of respondents were aware that washing hands before slaughtering the meat can limit the risk of food contamination. But the study highlights there is an inconsistent usage of gloves (91%), face masks (66%), and hair covers (71%) among the respondents as a significant presence of rodent infestations (56%), which indicates the knowledge-practice gap. Additionally, a notable hygienic practice identified is that 100% of respondents (currency notes and coins) have a unique habit of handling currency transactions while processing the meat, which may increase the risk of foodborne pathogens to the consumer. Among the interviewed butchers, some were unaware of poultry diseases (43%), and disappointedly, they responded to the poultry diseases as heat stress and nasal discharge (57%), highlighting the knowledge gap in disease and management. Statistical analysis revealed a positive association between educational level and theoretical understanding, as they are not experienced in good management practices, which suggests there is a need for regular hands-on training and monitoring to deliver hygienic poultry meat to the poultry meat consumers. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-026-02430-y.

Indexed as

BiosecurityHygienic practicesKnowledge-practice gapPoultry butchers

Identifiers

PMID42375495
PMCPMC13310833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.