ArticleDiscover public health2026
Assessment of food safety knowledge and hygiene practices among poultry butchers in Chennai and its public health implications.
Article in Discover public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chicken meat is common in human diets in Tamil Nadu, India, and poultry butchers play a vital role in food safety and prevention of meat-borne diseases. To assess food safety knowledge and hygiene practices among butchers, a survey was conducted from November 2022 to July 2023. A randomly selected panel of 375 poultry butchers was identified and interviewed from organized meat shops distributed across Chennai city, Tamil Nadu. The respondents were selected based on their active role in the slaughtering and butchering process. The survey revealed the slaughtering and butchering performed by males (100%), which indicate significant gender bias, although women accounted for 16%, of the shop ownership. The majority of the respondents were young adults (20-30 years) and had undergone elementary education (62%), with an average experience (10-15 years) of poultry meat handling (65%); they have not attended any formal biosecurity training (93%). Despite the lack of training, 79% of respondents were aware that washing hands before slaughtering the meat can limit the risk of food contamination. But the study highlights there is an inconsistent usage of gloves (91%), face masks (66%), and hair covers (71%) among the respondents as a significant presence of rodent infestations (56%), which indicates the knowledge-practice gap. Additionally, a notable hygienic practice identified is that 100% of respondents (currency notes and coins) have a unique habit of handling currency transactions while processing the meat, which may increase the risk of foodborne pathogens to the consumer. Among the interviewed butchers, some were unaware of poultry diseases (43%), and disappointedly, they responded to the poultry diseases as heat stress and nasal discharge (57%), highlighting the knowledge gap in disease and management. Statistical analysis revealed a positive association between educational level and theoretical understanding, as they are not experienced in good management practices, which suggests there is a need for regular hands-on training and monitoring to deliver hygienic poultry meat to the poultry meat consumers. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-026-02430-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.