Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375487›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2026

When size misleads: CT attenuation and enhancement characteristics predict benignity in a giant ovarian mucinous cystadenoma.

Srikanth Nalla, Pravin Sudhakar Patil, Sireesha Tv

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srikanth NallaDepartement of Radiodiagnosis, Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Pravin Sudhakar PatilDepartement of Radiodiagnosis, Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Sireesha TvDepartement of Obstretrics & Gynecology, Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant ovarian cysts are uncommon due to widespread early imaging detection; however, when encountered-particularly in perimenopausal women-they raise significant concern for malignancy. We report a 53-year-old woman presenting with progressive abdominal distension and 4 months of amenorrhea. Ultrasound demonstrated a 27 cm cystic adnexal mass with internal debris, categorized as O-RADS US 3. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a well-circumscribed cyst with homogeneous near-water attenuation (0-4 Hounsfield units), no enhancement, and no solid components, ascites, or lymphadenopathy-features demonstrating benign imaging characteristics analogous to O-RADS 2. Serum tumor markers (CA-125 15.9 U/mL, CEA 0.999 ng/mL, AFP 1.21 ng/mL, β-hCG < 0.2 mIU/mL, and LDH 215 U/L) were overall within or near normal limits. The patient underwent staging laparotomy, and histopathology confirmed benign mucinous cystadenoma with reactive changes in lymph nodes, omentum, and peritoneal biopsies. This case highlights that near-water CT attenuation and absence of enhancement are strong predictors of benignity even in extremely large adnexal masses, and that lesion size alone should not be considered a surrogate marker for malignancy.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyGiant ovarian cystHounsfield unitsMucinous cystadenomaO-RADSRadiologic-pathologic correlation

Identifiers

PMID42375487
PMCPMC13312006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.