Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375467›Full record

ArticleJournal of machine learning research : JMLR2026

Classification Under Local Differential Privacy with Model Reversal and Model Averaging.

Caihong Qin, Yang Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of machine learning research : JMLR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caihong QinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indiana, USA.
Yang BaiSchool of Statistics and Data Science & Institute of Data Science and Statistics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Measurement error correction approaches to wearable device-based measures of physical activity and self-reported measures of dietary intake in obesity and type 2 diabetes researchR01DK132385 · NIDDK · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI TEKWE, CARMEN D. · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
Novel Bayesian assessments of device-based physical activity and self-reported dietary intake in joint models of all-cause mortality and type 2 diabetes in a cohort of biracial older US adultsR01DK136994 · NIDDK · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Roger Sai Zoh · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132385NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK136994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local differential privacy (LDP) has become a central topic in data privacy research, offering strong privacy guarantees by perturbing user data at the source and removing the need for a trusted curator. However, the noise introduced by LDP often significantly reduces data utility. To address this issue, we reinterpret private learning under LDP as a transfer learning problem, where the noisy data serve as the source domain and the unobserved clean data as the target. We propose novel techniques specifically designed for LDP to improve classification performance without compromising privacy: (1) a noised binary feedback-based evaluation mechanism for estimating dataset utility; (2) model reversal, which salvages underperforming classifiers by inverting their decision boundaries; and (3) model averaging, which assigns weights to multiple reversed classifiers based on their estimated utility. We provide theoretical excess risk bounds under LDP and demonstrate how our methods reduce this risk. Empirical results on both simulated and real-world datasets show substantial improvements in classification accuracy.

Indexed as

dataset utilityexcess riskfunctional dataprivate learningtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42375467
PMCPMC13313048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.