ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026
Elastic functional Cox regression model with shape predictors.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phase variability in functional data can obscure prominent geometric features, e.g. local extrema, and deteriorate predictive performance of regression models with functional predictors. We propose an elastic functional Cox regression model (EFCRM) that captures the association between a time-to-event outcome and the shape of a functional predictor. As such, EFCRM accounts for phase variation in the functional predictor via registration, which is supervised by the survival outcome. The model is fit using an iterative algorithm that alternates between removal of phase variation and estimation of the regression coefficient function. To improve convergence of the estimation procedure, we use a small number of separate gradient-based updates at each iteration for the two steps. The model is assessed based on estimation accuracy and predictive performance using a simulation study. We additionally apply the proposed framework to two real-world datasets. Overall, we show that the EFCRM is robust to misspecification of the number and type of basis functions used to approximate the coefficient function and results in comparable or better estimation accuracy and predictive ability than competitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.