Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375425›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias in poorly performing horses.

Osamah Muwaffag Aliraqi, Basima Abdulfatah Albadrani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Osamah Muwaffag AliraqiDepartment of Internal and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Basima Abdulfatah AlbadraniDepartment of Internal and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiogram abnormalities are common in racehorses and can affect performance. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the results of electrocardiographic problems and measure the frequencies of various cardiac arrhythmias. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2023 and August 2024. Standard electrocardiographic recordings were obtained from all horses, and cardiac troponin levels were measured. Out of the 114 poorly performing adult horses, 10 cases without arrhythmia were considered the control group. Seventy-four horses (64.9%) had at least one type of cardiac arrhythmia, 60 (52.63%) had atrial fibrillation, and 29 (25.44%) had left axis deviation and left ventricular hypertrophy. Results: The most frequent conduction anomaly was atrioventricular block in 34 horses (29.82%), followed by QT prolongation in 54 horses (47.36%), and QTc prolongation in 50 horses (43.85%). Bradycardia was detected in 20 (17.54%) horses, and ST-segment depression was present in 25 (21.93%) horses. Conduction disturbances, including left bundle branch block in 13 horses (11.40%) and right bundle branch block in 26 horses (22.81%). Troponin levels were significantly elevated in cases of arrhythmia. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was significantly higher in male horses in all age groups except the oldest. Conclusion: Because cardiac arrhythmia may lead to racehorse exercise intolerance and suboptimal performance, early diagnosis is important to allow veterinarians to develop long-term treatment strategies. Furthermore, electrocardiography, along with cardiac biomarker cardiac troponin, is essential.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacHorse DiseasesAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHorsesMalePhysical Conditioning, AnimalPrevalence: ArrhythmiaElectrocardiographyHorse

Identifiers

PMID42375425
PMCPMC13313875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.