Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375406›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026

Chicory (

Shirley B Pariona-Rodas, Misael Rodriguez, Flor L Mejía, Medali Cueva-Rodríguez, Yolvi López, Héctor V Vásquez, José A Saucedo-Uriarte, Segundo J Zamora-Huamán, Ysai Paucar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shirley B Pariona-RodasEscuela Profesional de Ingeniería Agropecuaria, Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Andahuaylas, Perú.
Misael RodriguezEscuela Profesional de Ingeniería Agropecuaria, Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Andahuaylas, Perú.
Flor L MejíaLaboratorio de Nutrición Animal y Bromatología de Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Perú.
Medali Cueva-RodríguezLaboratorio de Patología Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca, Cajamarca, Perú.
Yolvi LópezInstituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria, Estación Experimental Andenes, Cusco, Perú.
Héctor V VásquezLaboratorio de Agrostología, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Perú.
José A Saucedo-UriarteLaboratorio de Agrostología, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Perú.
Segundo J Zamora-HuamánLaboratorio de Nutrición Animal y Bromatología de Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Perú.
Ysai PaucarLaboratorio de Nutrición Animal y Bromatología de Alimentos, Instituto de Investigación en Ganadería y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas, Perú.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alternative forages, such as chicory and plantain, have been successfully applied in various animal species. As a result, these forages could serve as an alternative for raising guinea pigs in high Andean regions; however, few, if any, reports have been published on the effects of their inclusion on growth, production, and carcass yield. Aim: This study aimed to determine the effects of incorporating chicory and plantain into the diet of guinea pigs on growth, production, and carcass yield, elucidating the possibility of using these species for feeding guinea pigs. Methods: The study was conducted in Andahuaylas-Perú, in an experimental period of 6 weeks. Five guinea pigs were randomly assigned to each diet treatment (30% chicory-70% lucerne, 30% plantain-70% lucerne, 50% chicory-50% lucerne, 50% plantain-50% lucerne, and 100% lucerne as a control). Growth, production, and carcass yield were measured. Covariance analysis was performed using R software, and the means were compared using Dunnett's method (α = 0.05). Results: Diets with chicory (30%-50%) improved the final live weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and hot carcass weight, whereas diets with plantain (30%) improved the final live weight, dry matter intake, feed conversion ratio, and carcass weight compared with diets with 100% lucerne. Conclusion: Chicory and plantain can optimize the growth, production, and hot carcass weight of guinea pigs in high Andean areas, surpassing traditional lucerne diets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedCichorium intybusDietPlantagoAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBody CompositionFemaleGuinea PigsMalePeruCarcassCichorium intybusGrowthGuinea pigPlantago lanceolata

Identifiers

PMID42375406
PMCPMC13314331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.