ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Severity-associated cross-reactive anti-sarbecovirus antibody responses in COVID-19 convalescents and isolation of a dual-targeting monoclonal antibody with cross-neutralizing activity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarbecoviruses pose a persistent pandemic threat due to their zoonotic potential and high recombination capacity. This study investigated how disease severity influences cross-reactive antibody responses and the isolation of cross-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Methods: Plasma samples from 67 COVID-19 convalescents (severe, n=17; non-severe, n=50) were compared for cross-reactive antibody responses against seven sarbecovirus spike proteins. Memory B cells were sorted using dual S1/S2 fluorescent probes to isolate monoclonal antibodies. Results: Severe convalescents exhibited significantly higher neutralization titers against six animal-derived sarbecoviruses, responses that persisted for up to one year and were further enhanced by vaccination. From dual-targeting B cells, we isolated mAb 1D6, which simultaneously engages the S1 (ACE2-blocking) and S2 (fusion-inhibiting) domains. mAb 1D6 neutralized SARS-CoV-2 (IC50 = 5.708 μg/mL) and pangolin-CoV-GD (IC50 = 14.02 μg/mL). In contrast, antibody 1F2 bound both S1 and S2 across all tested sarbecoviruses but lacked neutralizing activity. Conclusions: Severe COVID-19 was associated with broader and more durable cross-sarbecovirus antibody responses. The dual-targeting antibody 1D6 provides proof-of-concept for a cross-neutralization strategy, although its modest potency requires further optimization for therapeutic application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.