ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Exploratory investigation of changes in blood transcriptome following mepolizumab treatment for asthma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of mepolizumab therapy on the blood transcriptome in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) and to determine whether changes in gene expression predict responsiveness to mepolizumab treatment. Methods: Fourteen consecutive patients diagnosed with SEA were prospectively enrolled. Each patient had sequential blood samples obtained pre-initiation and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-initiation of mepolizumab. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from blood samples for bulk RNA sequencing. Paired differential expression (DE) gene analysis was performed comparing baseline gene expression versus all timepoints. Changes in gene expression were also compared between responders versus nonresponders to mepolizumab treatment. Finally, gene set enrichment analysis was evaluated across timepoints and its interaction with the response to mepolizumab treatment. Results: Principal component analysis of all genes demonstrated a homogeneous distribution, which did not separate into distinct groups based on either timepoint or therapeutic response. At week 12, 149 genes had significant DE (FDR < 0.05) compared to baseline. When performing all-way timepoint comparisons, 74 genes (63 protein-coding) were found to be downregulated at weeks 4, 8 and 12 compared to baseline, but no differences were observed between post baseline timepoints. Twenty-eight genes (16 protein-coding) did change with progression of time and were associated with response to therapy, and 56 protein-coding genes distinguished responders and nonresponders. At week 12, nonresponders had a high enrichment of genes involved with signaling pathways, including cytokines, growth factors, cell differentiation markers, and protein kinases. Conclusion: In this exploratory study, mepolizumab use was associated with limited global transcriptomic separation with some preliminary differential-expression and enrichment findings. No definitive mechanistic or predictive response signatures were identified due to the study limitations. Future studies, including larger cohorts followed for longer durations with interrogation of specific immune subsets, may offer additional insight into the pathophysiology of severe eosinophilic asthma and into predicting response to mepolizumab treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.