ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Development and validation of diagnostic prediction models for central precocious puberty in girls based on machine learning: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We developed novel diagnostic prediction models for central precocious puberty (CPP) diagnosis in girls based on machine learning. Methods: In this retrospective study, 2148 girls with PP from 4 centers in China were included, and divided into training group (n = 1048), validation group (n = 262), test group 1 (n = 270), test group 2 (n = 278), and test group 3 (n = 290). Diagnostic prediction models were developed based on logistic regression, linear support vector machine (SVM), RandomForest, XGBoost and fully connected neural network. Model discrimination was assessed with C-statistics and accuracy rates. Model calibration was analyzed by calibration curves. Results: A total of eight independent predictors were screened by Lasso regression, including chronological age, disease course, height SDS, basal luteinizing hormone, bone age (BA) - chronological age (CA), height SDS for bone age, uterine volume, and larger ovarian volume. Among the five established prediction models, the SVM model demonstrated optimal performance, achieving AUC values of 0.850 in internal validation and 0.827 in external validation, accuracy rates of 78.6% in internal validation and 72.1% average in external validations. The model is displayed on the website: https://wuwenyong.shinyapps.io/CPPpredict/. Conclusions: The SVM prediction model can assist diagnose CPP. Through the internal and multi-center external validations, the model showed good degree of discrimination and calibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.