Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42375331›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Decoding the reproductive microbiome: enabling clinical and biological insights through machine and deep learning.

Ignacio Garach Vélez, Irene Leonés-Baños, Bárbara A Folch, Laura Antequera, Ignacio Rojas, Francisco Ortuño, María José Sáez Lara, Signe Altmäe, Luis Javier Herrera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ignacio Garach VélezDepartment of Computer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics, CITIC, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Irene Leonés-BañosDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Bárbara A FolchDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Laura AntequeraDepartment of Computer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics, CITIC, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Ignacio RojasDepartment of Computer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics, CITIC, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francisco OrtuñoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics, CITIC, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
María José Sáez LaraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Signe Altmäe *Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Luis Javier Herrera *Department of Computer Engineering, Automatics and Robotics, CITIC, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Technological advances have revolutionised the microbiome research in the field of human reproduction, identifying the microbiome as important regulator of reproductive health and functions, where microbes are now linked to sperm quality, ovarian function, endometrial receptivity, embryo implantation, and pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage and preterm birth. However, the field faces a 'descriptive phase' due to the fragmentation of datasets and a lack of functional integration. To progress towards broader understanding and clinical utility, robust computational frameworks are required to translate complex microbial signatures into predictive insights. Methods: This review classifies the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) into essential methodological pillars. We evaluate the entire computational workflow from sequencing data generation to predictive modelling, including data pre-processing for sparsity and compositionality, exploratory, diversity, functional and differential abundance analyses, and advanced data integration to harmonise data across samples, independent datasets, and multiple 16S regions. Particular emphasis is placed on feature selection for biomarker signatures, synthetic data generation, and phenotype classification. Where reproductive-specific evidence is currently limited, normally due to scarce study cohorts, we present proof-of-concept studies from other human niches to demonstrate potential applications. Furthermore, we address the need for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to ensure biological interpretability and guide clinical decisions effectively. Conclusion: Transitioning from descriptive to predictive reproductive medicine relies on integrating ML/DL approaches with biological knowledge. Challenges like small cohort sizes can be overcome through the integration and harmonisation of independent datasets. On a methodological level, researchers should adopt ensemble-based differential abundance and feature selection to reduce data and tool-specific biases. Crucially, any steps altering data nature-such as synthetic data generation-must be strictly confined to training sets to prevent data leakage and preserve model validity. Alongside these technical precautions, standardising analytical workflows and prioritising interpretability are key practical steps. While clinical translation requires extensive validation, moving toward predictive studies is a fundamental first step for future personalised reproductive care. With the current review, we highlight the methodological considerations of ML/DL and provide recommendations for future microbiome studies in the field.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningMicrobiotaReproductionData AnalyticsFemaleHumansPredictive Learning Modelsbiomarker identificationdata integrationdeep learningmachine learningmicrobiomemicrobiotamulti-omic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42375331
PMCPMC13310787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.