ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
The clinical value of analyzing predictive models for gastric function and gastric organic lesions.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical value of the predictive models for gastric function and gastric organic lesions. Methods: Clinical data from 1,677 patients with digestive tract-related symptoms at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University between June 2015 and March 2023 were selected, including questionnaire responses, serum gastric function tests, gastroscopy, and gastroscopic pathology data. The above data were input into a gastric function prediction model based on question-and-answer [GFPSBQA] V1.0 and a gastric organic lesion prediction model [GDPSIQSM] V1.0, both of which integrated questionnaires and serum markers. The model's output results were compared with the results of laboratory tests and gastroscopy (including pathology), and the model's accuracy was analyzed. Results: The sensitivity of the gastric function prediction model was 91.16%, the specificity was 39.18%, the positive predictive value was 83.27%, the negative predictive value was 57.14%, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.702, and the Youden index was 0.303. The sensitivity of the gastric organic lesion prediction model was 89.55%, the specificity was 33.22%, the positive predictive value was 70.86%, the negative predictive value was 63.67%, the AUC was 0.672, and the Youden index was 0.228. Conclusion: Both the gastric function prediction model and the gastric organic lesion prediction model demonstrate high sensitivity and good predictive performance, and may have potential clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.