ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
Effects of Farmer Socio-Demographics on Animal Welfare Knowledge and Practices in Peri-Urban Duck Production Systems.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Animal welfare (AW) is an important issue in sustainable livestock production. However, many small farmers in developing countries still do not understand and widely apply AW. Aim: This study aims to investigate the impact of farm and farmer characteristics, including age, education, farming experience, and flock size, on AW knowledge (AWK) and practices among duck farmers in Bekasi, Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 29 duck farmers using a structured questionnaire that assessed farm and farmer characteristics, AWK, and AWP in accordance with the Five Freedoms of AW. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the data and identify factors influencing AWK, and AWP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminatory performance of significant predictors. Results: Among the 29 peri-urban duck farmers, 72.4% demonstrated high AWK, whereas only 20.7% demonstrated high welfare practices. Logistic regression identified education as a significant predictor of welfare knowledge and farming experience as a significant predictor of welfare practices. ROC analysis indicated that farming experience had fair discriminative ability for high welfare practices (area under the curve = 0.786). Despite the small sample size, the findings reflect the characteristics of the small duck-farming population in peri-urban Bekasi. Conclusion: AWK did not vary across farmer characteristics, whereas education and experience influenced AWP. These findings highlight the importance of training and extension programs to improve AW in peri-urban duck farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.