ReviewOpen veterinary journal2026
Avian influenza virus H5N1 and H9N2 subtypes in different birds and humans: Findings from an extensive evaluation.
Review in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The H5N1 and H9N2 subtypes of the avian influenza virus (AIV), part of the Orthomyxoviridae family, induce one of the most severe zoonotic diseases. The harmful impacts of H5 and H9 avian influenza viruses can affect avian and mammalian species, including human health, and result in economic loss and public health hazards. It has been isolated from several avian species and humans throughout all continents, except Antarctica. The incidence of avian influenza fluctuates based on regional and temporal variables of various avian species and humans. The AIV subtypes are categorized into low-pathogenic and high-pathogenic according to their virulence. H9N2 was classified as low pathogenic, whereas H5N1 was deemed highly pathogenic. Molecular diagnostic tests, such as real-time polymerase chain reaction and conventional polymerase chain reaction, are used to identify avian influenza viruses. The most common serological tests, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutinin inhibition, are used to detect antibodies against influenza A and B viruses. AIV subtypes and host species affect the severity, clinical manifestations, and fatality rates of AIVs. Avian and swine infections are the primary vectors for the transmission of AIV to humans, presenting a considerable public health risk. An adequate surveillance system, a robust vaccination approach, and a segregation and culling protocol for avian influenza-infected birds are urgently required to eliminate avian influenza viruses. This comprehensive study provides a framework for understanding the risks associated with AIV subtypes H5 and H9. The goal is to avoid and control the disease, as it can spread into a major pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.