ArticleOpen veterinary journal2026
Molecular and conventional detection of
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A wide range of licensed foods (LFs) and foods prepared by individuals (FPIs) in local stores and restaurants have been frequently blamed for food poisoning in many consumers. To the best of our knowledge, no data are available on the status of contamination in these foods. Aim: This study was conducted to estimate the contamination levels and detect some bacterial pathogens in different food sources prepared by individuals in local stores and restaurants in Al-Kut City, Iraq. Methods: Food samples were subjected to microscopic examination and counting. These samples were also examined for the presence of Results: The results revealed high bacterial and fungal contamination as discovered by the microscopic method. Furthermore, these samples showed a significant (p < 0.05) presence of Conclusion: The results suggest that high levels of contamination in different food samples need control procedures for better protection against food-borne diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.