ArticleCase reports in medicine2026
Tourniquet-Induced Atypical Lower Back Pain Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Case Report and Mechanistic Exploration of Referred Pain.
Article in Case reports in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tourniquet-Induced Atypical Lower Back Pain Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Case Report and Mechanistic Exploration of Referred Pain.Case reports in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tourniquet-associated complications typically manifest as localized limb symptoms or systemic reactions. Here, we report a rare case of acute, severe lower back pain directly induced by a tourniquet during lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. A 32-year-old male developed intense lower back pain (VAS: 4-10) approximately 1.5 h after tourniquet application to the right thigh, accompanied by elevated blood pressure and agitation, while bilateral lower limb sensorimotor blockade remained intact (T11-S5 level). Intravenous analgesics provided only transient and limited relief. Crucially, within approximately two minutes of pausing the procedure and releasing the tourniquet, the patient's pain completely resolved (VAS: 0) without additional analgesia, and the anesthetic level was unchanged. This case provides the first clear documentation of tourniquet pain presenting as isolated truncal pain entirely remote from the ischemic region. We propose that this phenomenon arises because spinal anesthesia blocks somatic sensory input from the lower limbs, leading to nociceptive signals from ischemic muscle being transmitted via incompletely blocked visceral or sympathetic afferent pathways to the spinal cord. According to the convergence-projection theory, these signals are then misinterpreted by the brain as originating from the lower back (T10-L2 dermatomes). This finding reveals how regional anesthesia can fundamentally alter the clinical presentation of tourniquet pain, addresses a critical gap in the current understanding of this complication, and alerts clinicians to include atypical referred pain in their differential diagnosis to prevent misdiagnosis and excessive medical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.