ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Risk of Hyperkalemia in Patients with Heart Failure Treated with Spironolactone in Combination with Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to compare the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure initiating spironolactone while receiving sacubitril/valsartan vs. those initiating while on a RASi in a real-world clinical setting among a heterogeneous population. We conducted a new-user, active comparator cohort study of patients with heart failure initiating spironolactone from April 1, 2016, to July 31, 2024, using a large national commercial insurance database. Patients were classified as RASi users (continuous ACEi/ARB use ≥30 days prior to and including spironolactone initiation) or ARNI users (continuous sacubitril/valsartan use over the same period). Propensity score based fine-stratification weighting was used for confounding control. Outcomes included hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L) and severe hyperkalemia (>6 mmol/L), assessed over a maximum follow-up of 180 days. About 57,926 patients initiated spironolactone: 8,589 while on ARNI (mean age: 70.6 years, 39.5% female) and 49,337 while on RASi (mean age: 72.8 years, 48.6% female). Incidence rates (95% confidence intervals) for hyperkalemia were lower among ARNI users (9.44 (8.46, 10.51) vs. 12.55 (12.07, 13.04) per 100 person-years), corresponding to a weighted rate difference of -1.20 (-1.74, -0.60) events per 100 person-years. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were 0.89 (0.79-1.01) for hyperkalemia and 0.74 (0.57-0.95) for severe hyperkalemia. Findings were consistent across subgroups. Initiation of spironolactone among patients with heart failure receiving sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a lower risk of severe hyperkalemia, compared with RASi use. This study expands upon previous findings suggesting the risk of hyperkalemia when using MRAs may be mitigated through the substitution of sacubitril/valsartan for RASi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.