ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Network Analysis of Healthcare Worker Burnout: Organizational Factors Show Highest Centrality.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare worker burnout is a complex phenomenon that traditional linear models fail to fully explain. This study uses network analysis to map the associative interactions between organizational factors, mental health symptoms, and burnout dimensions in a national sample of Peruvian physicians and nurses. Cross-sectional network analysis using data from the 2016 National Healthcare Worker Survey, comprising 4951 healthcare professionals (2125 physicians, 2826 nurses). Twenty-two variables spanning burnout dimensions (MBI-GS), mental health symptoms, work satisfaction, and organizational factors were analyzed using Gaussian Graphical Models with bootstrap validation (1000 iterations). Expected Influence, Betweenness, Closeness, and Strength centrality indices were calculated. Network invariance testing compared structural differences between professions. The network comprised 22 nodes with 82 non-zero edges (density = 0.355). Health services management satisfaction showed the highest expected influence (EI = 2.14), followed by monthly income (EI = 1.49). Emotional exhaustion showed substantial negative influence (EI = -0.46). Network invariance testing revealed statistically significant structural differences between professions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.