ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Lived Experiences of Patients With Rare Diseases and Healthcare System Barriers: A Phenomenological Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lived Experiences of Patients With Rare Diseases and Healthcare System Barriers: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore the lived experiences and perceptions of patients with rare diseases (RD) in relation to the disease process and its management by the healthcare system.
backgroundAlthough each RD individually affects fewer than 0.05% of the population, collectively RD affect between 3.5% and 5.9% of the global population, representing approximately 400 million people worldwide. Most RD are chronic, progressive, and debilitating, with 80% having a genetic origin. Despite advances, diagnosing RD remains complex, often taking 4 to 8 years, worsening patient outcomes and increasing healthcare costs. Furthermore, 95% of RD lack approved treatments, presenting significant challenges for both patients and healthcare systems.
methodsAn interpretative phenomenological qualitative study following Gadamer's hermeneutic framework was conducted. Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted between February 2022 and January 2024. Seventeen patients with RD were recruited using purposeful sampling. ATLAS.ti v.9 software was used solely to organize and manage the data during the analysis process.
resultsTwo main interpretive themes emerged: (1) RD: a desperate struggle against abstraction and hindrance, describing the emotional burden, diagnostic delays, and social consequences faced by patients with RD and (2) management and handling of RD by the healthcare system, highlighting professional unpreparedness, lack of coordination, and the key role patients and caregivers play in guiding care and sharing knowledge, alongside the emergence of peer support, digital tools, and social media as facilitators.
conclusionThis study highlights the significant barriers patients with RD face, from diagnosis to treatment. Healthcare systems struggle with insufficient knowledge and resources, hindering effective care. It is essential for professionals to acquire specialized skills and for resource allocation to improve in order to address RD as a public health concern. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: As part of an interprofessional team, nursing professionals play a vital role in supporting patients with RD throughout the diagnostic journey, treatment, and management. This study highlights the need for nurses to address not only clinical but also psychosocial and informational challenges, including guiding patients in the safe and effective use of social media as a source of support, information, and empowerment. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients contributed as participants in the study by sharing their lived experiences through in-depth interviews. No patients or members of the public were involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.