ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026
Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVertical alveolar bone defects often require advanced augmentation techniques to enable successful implant placement. The aim of this study was to compare short-term vertical bone gain following two approaches: the bone-ring graft technique and guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a non-resorbable membrane in patients with vertical alveolar deficiencies. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted involving 30 systemically healthy adult patients with posterior mandibular vertical bone defects measuring ≥4 mm. Participants were assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group A received the bone ring in conjunction with titanium implants and a resorbable collagen membrane; Group B was treated with allogeneic bone grafts and titanium-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes. Radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and periapical radiographs. The primary outcome was vertical bone height gain. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28.0.
resultsGroup A demonstrated statistically significantly greater vertical bone gain at all postoperative intervals: 9.1 mm at 1 week, 10.6 mm at 1 month, and 9.7 mm at 3 months, compared to 7.8 mm, 7.0 mm, and 6.9 mm, respectively, in Group B (p 0.0001). Plaque index scores were comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed in postoperative swelling or infection rates. However, membrane exposure was statistically significantly more frequent in Group B at all follow-up visits (p ≤ 0.02).
conclusionThe bone-ring graft technique was associated with greater vertical bone gain and a lower incidence of membrane exposure compared to GBR using a non-resorbable membrane. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.