ArticleJournal of trauma and injury2026
Impact of the simulation-based Airway and Catheter Cannulation Education-from Starters to Specialists (ACCESS) program for critical care procedures.
Article in Journal of trauma and injury, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCentral venous catheterization and endotracheal intubation are critical lifesaving procedures, yet structured training opportunities remain limited and often rely on informal apprenticeships. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Airway and Catheter Cannulation Education-from Starters to Specialists (ACCESS) program in improving procedural knowledge, confidence, and ultrasound proficiency.
methodsData from 70 healthcare professionals (38 residents, 28 specialists, and 4 others) who completed the ACCESS program between 2022 and 2025 were analyzed. Participants were divided into two cohorts: a retrospective cohort (n=46) from 2022 to 2023, who completed the post-training questionnaire only, and a prospective cohort (n=24) from 2024 to 2025, who underwent pre- and post-training assessments. The questionnaire used a self-reported 10-point Likert scale.
resultsOverall, 67 valid post-training responses were analyzed, excluding 3 incomplete surveys from the prospective group. Participants reported exceptional satisfaction, with clinicians (>6 years of experience) reporting higher satisfaction with equipment (P=0.020). In the prospective cohort (pre-training, n=24; post-training, n=21), significant improvements were observed across all domains (P<0.001). Ultrasound proficiency showed the most dramatic increase (from 4.67 to 8.81), accompanied by marked improvements in procedural confidence.
conclusionsThe ACCESS program effectively enhanced procedural competence, especially ultrasound-guided skills. The significant improvement observed in the cohort with a high percentage of specialists underscores the limitations of traditional models and highlights the critical value of standardized high-fidelity simulation training programs for physicians at all career stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.