Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374608›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental quality

A phosphogypsum inventory: Regulatory frameworks and research trends for sustainable management.

Ertuğrul Çelik, Cemre Avşar Kaya, Suna Ertunç

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ertuğrul ÇelikDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-4311
Cemre Avşar KayaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8953-9859
Suna ErtunçDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-7463

Funding

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) 118C085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphogypsum (PG), the primary by-product of phosphate fertilizer industry, was formerly classified as a hazardous waste, and the most common method of PG management was stacking without further treatment. Global population growth has led to a rapid increase in consumption strategies and affected the balance in global resource recovery. Within the compliance to sustainable development goals and increasing awareness to resource recovery, PG perspective was also irreversibly changed. Global phosphate industry has recognized that PG management is worth from both environmental and financial point of view. Thus, PG is accepted to be a secondary input with high revenue potential. Due to concerns regarding environmental protection, regulations have been more stringent on PG storage and disposal, directing the policies on PG management to circular economy practices. This review provides an insight into regulatory frameworks by country and latest trends on PG management strategies that would support the development of effective resource utilization.

Indexed as

Calcium SulfateConservation of Natural ResourcesPhosphorusWaste ManagementFertilizersCalcium SulfateFertilizersphosphogypsumPhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID42374608
PMCPMC13494435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.