ArticleBMC psychology2026
Perceived COVID-19 threat and job satisfaction among healthcare workers: the indirect role of job stress and the moderating role of coping strategies.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic introduced unprecedented demands on healthcare systems globally. This study aimed to investigate the associations between perceived coronavirus disease 2019 threat, job stress, job satisfaction, and stress-coping strategies among healthcare workers within an integrated relational framework.
methodsUtilizing a cross-sectional relational screening design, data were collected online via convenience sampling from 448 healthcare professionals (including physicians, nurses, midwives, and technicians) working in healthcare institutions in Turkey. Data collection tools included personal information forms, the Perceived Coronavirus Disease 2019 Threat Scale, the Minnesota Job Satisfaction Survey, the Job Stress Scale, and the Coping with Stress Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Jamovi software. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and path analysis based on ordinary least squares regression were applied. Moderation analyses were conducted to examine whether specific coping strategies interacted with job stress and job satisfaction.
resultsPath analysis indicated that job stress served as a significant potential indirect pathway between perceived threat and job satisfaction. Moderation analysis revealed significant interaction terms, demonstrating that positive evaluation and seeking professional support functioned as critical moderators in the relationship between job stress and job satisfaction. Specifically, the total association model remained significant for workers with low and medium levels of positive evaluation, where job stress demonstrated a potential partial indirect role. For seeking professional support, the total association model was significant across low, medium, and high levels. Job stress exhibited a potential partial indirect role for individuals with low and medium levels of seeking professional support, whereas a potential full indirect role was observed for those with high levels.
conclusionsThe findings underscore that job stress is an important conceptual link connecting pandemic-related threat perceptions to diminished job satisfaction. Furthermore, specific coping mechanisms, particularly positive evaluation and professional support-seeking behaviors, modify how job stress correlates with occupational satisfaction. Interventions aimed at enhancing targeted coping strategies and mitigating structural workplace stress are recommended to preserve the psychological well-being and job satisfaction of healthcare personnel during public health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.