Observational studyClinical and translational science2026
Circulating M-MDSC Expansion During Therapy Associates With Treatment Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Longitudinal Observational Study.
Observational study in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in multiple myeloma: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic changes in myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) during multiple myeloma (MM) treatment remain poorly understood. In this longitudinal observational study, circulating monocytic (M-MDSCs) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) were measured by flow cytometry in 99 newly diagnosed MM patients at diagnosis, post-induction, and Day 100 after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Primary analyses were restricted to the bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd)-treated cohort (n = 78) to avoid regimen-specific confounding. VRd, but not daratumumab-based regimens, significantly expanded M-MDSCs (median Δ +0.98%, p < 0.0001), which normalized after ASCT. In the VRd cohort, ΔM-MDSCs (post-induction minus baseline) were higher in patients achieving ≤ partial response (PR) than in those with ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) (median +1.56% vs. +0.50%, p = 0.0083). In univariable analysis, ΔM-MDSCs, R2-ISS stage, and MRD positivity each met the p < 0.20 threshold; however, MRD was excluded from multivariable modeling due to collinearity with response. In a two-variable model adjusted for R2-ISS, ΔM-MDSCs were not an independent predictor of suboptimal response (OR 1.28 per 1% increase, 95% CI 0.95-1.74, p = 0.109), and bootstrap validation yielded confidence intervals overlapping unity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an AUC of 0.730, but the derived cutoff was not used for modeling. VRd induction is associated with transient M-MDSC expansion that correlates with response depth, but ΔM-MDSCs did not retain independent predictive value after adjustment. These hypothesis-generating findings require validation in larger independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.