ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2026
Rethinking AI in youth mental health: promise, perils, and ethical integration.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in youth mental health care as intelligent agents that can support patient engagement and augment healthcare delivery has been explored in this commentary. By acting as personalized virtual assistants for both patients and providers, LLMs have the potential to offer real-time, context-aware support, improving administrative workflows within mental health services. However, there is increasing concern within the research community regarding overinflation of claims surrounding large language models in mental healthcare. Technology companies often overstate their capabilities, creating unrealistic expectations that may lead to detrimental outcomes for patients. This paper critically examines the opportunities and limitations, advocating for greater transparency and rigorous scrutiny in the application of AI within sensitive domains such as mental health. It underscores the need for developmentally appropriate engagement, cultural sensitivity, and the integration of human expertise alongside AI to ensure ethical and effective collaboration in mental healthcare interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.