Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374494›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2026

BRCAShare: a video-based message can increase sharing of familial genetic test results.

Katie Riefski, Amber Aeilts, Alexandra Spencer, Sue Friedman, Julia Cooper, Leigha Senter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katie RiefskiCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5737-0453
Amber AeiltsDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-7853
Alexandra SpencerDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-4714
Sue FriedmanFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE), Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-1333
Julia CooperDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2532-0767
Leigha SenterDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. leigha.senter-jamieson@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9270-8847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic testing for known familial pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes is central to identifying relatives at heightened risk for cancer. However, current data suggest that uptake of this practice referred to as "cascade testing" remains suboptimal. Research demonstrates that healthcare providers can alleviate barriers to cascade testing by providing informational resources to facilitate patient-mediated sharing of their genetic test results with their at-risk relatives.

methodsWe recruited 103 individuals with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in BRCA1or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). Participants were randomized to receive a family communication guide with or without a 2-minute video (BRCAShare) that describes the concept of a relative's recent diagnosis of a harmful variant in BRCA1/2, meant to facilitate sharing of results with relatives. All participants were given surveys to assess reactions to and impact of BRCAShare across three domains: (1) participants' sharing of genetic information and intent to share genetic information; (2) perceived susceptibility to and seriousness of BRCA1/2 cancer related risks, benefits, or barriers to intrafamilial sharing of results and cascade testing; (3) the impact of family dynamic on sharing of genetic information.

resultsThe group given access to the BRCAShare video (guide + video) had significantly higher odds of reporting an intent to share and actual sharing with other family members compared to those who did not receive BRCAShare (guide only). Perceptions of cancer risk did not change significantly after viewing BRCAShare, however participants demonstrated strong understanding of risks and benefits of genetic testing at baseline. There was not a significant association between family dynamics and more intent to share.

conclusionsOur research suggests that this video message is a useful method for facilitating family sharing of BRCA1/2 results.

Indexed as

BRCA1BRCA2Cascade testingFamily communicationVideo

Identifiers

PMID42374494
PMCPMC13580004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.