ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Intraoperative NIR-II fluorescence guidance for precise tumor margin assessment and maximized tissue preservation in breast surgery.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate margin assessment remains a challenge in breast-conserving surgery, where inaccuracy leads to excessive removal and compromised aesthetics. Although second near-infrared (NIR-II) fluorescence imaging offers high contrast, there is still a lack of clinically viable NIR-II equipment.
methodsWe develop an innovative NIR-II fluorescence navigation platform based on indocyanine green (ICG) that enables rapid deployment, operation-friendly workflow, and precision-at-hand capability for intraoperative guidance. Thirty-seven patients were recruited with 1 mg/kg ICG injection 45 minutes before surgery. Image quality was evaluated using perception-based image quality evaluator (PIQE) score, while quantitative analyses of fluorescence, including tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR) and signal-to-background ratio (SBR), together with histopathology and a multi-level reader study, were performed to assess tumor contrast and diagnostic performance.
resultsCompared to conventional NIR-I imaging, our NIR-II system demonstrates performance with enhanced spatial resolution and a higher tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (4.383 ± 1.719 versus 3.154 ± 1.072, P < 0.0001) in 37 patients. The intraoperative NIR-II imaging demonstrates superior tumor detection sensitivity [90.63% (75.78%-96.76%) vs. 84.38% (68.25%-93.14%)], with 100% diagnostic accuracy in delineating malignant tumor margins. Ex vivo NIR-II imaging enables real-time, precise visualization of tumor margins and suggested its potential to reduce the volume of excision. (NIR-II-defined volume < NIR-I-defined volume < current resection volume). Through brief training, surgeons can effectively utilize NIR-II imaging, shortening the learning curve for young surgeons in tumor and margin assessment.
conclusionThis study demonstrates a clinically adaptable NIR-II imaging platform that expands intraoperative visualization without changing surgical workflow or adding operational burden, supporting standardized margin assessment and improved tissue preservation in breast surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.