ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
Modular plug-and-play engineering of Klebsiella phages with dual receptor-binding proteins for efficient host range design.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-genus phage design through branching domain and conserved peptide interactions.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high capsular diversity restricting the host range of many Klebsiella phages has driven the evolution of branched receptor-binding protein (RBP) systems as a strategy for host range expansion. These dual RBP systems offer a unique opportunity for modular engineering. However, most previous approaches lacked a standardized and systematic framework to exploit an engineering platform that enables efficient and modular reprogramming of Klebsiella podophages with dual RBP systems.
resultsThe workflow integrates (I) the VersaTile technique for rapid assembly of chimeric RBP gene clusters, (II) Gibson assembly for in vitro genome construction, and (III) electroporation-based rebooting. By retaining one native RBP, the system ensures that a suitable host is always available for rebooting, reducing technical failure, and allowing a clear distinction between biological incompatibility and assembly issues. Using this approach, we systematically swapped full-length RBPs and receptor-binding domains (RBDs) at both positions of the dual RBP system in podophages K11 and KP32, confirming the modularity and interchangeability of structural and enzymatic domains. Advanced designs, including cross-swapping and position swapping, were successfully implemented, while attempts to graft phylogenetically distant RBPs revealed structural constraints that inform future design strategies.
conclusionThis work introduces a standardized, scalable, and plug-and-play framework for phage engineering that leverages the modularity of dual RBP systems. By ensuring rebooting through an unmodified RBP, the platform provides a robust foundation for systematic host range reprogramming and functional studies of RBP architecture, paving the way for rational design of therapeutic phages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.