ReviewJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Extrapedicular approach for basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a conceptual review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic axial low back pain (LBP) of vertebrogenic origin is increasingly recognized as a distinct clinical entity responsive to basivertebral nerve (BVN) radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This analysis synthesizes the anatomical, biomechanical, and safety considerations of both access routes and evaluates their clinical implications.
methodsA literature review was conducted in PubMed for articles on BVNRFA anatomy, techniques, and access routes published through December 1, 2025. Given the limited literature on extrapedicular BVNRFA, studies from the vertebral augmentation literature were included if appropriate for access route considerations.
resultsThe standard technique for BVNRFA utilizes a transpedicular trajectory to access the vertebral body, which provides a consistent trajectory using the pedicle but places the introducer in proximity to the facet joints, dorsal root ganglion, exiting spinal nerve, and paraspinal muscles. Emerging evidence has described the extrapedicular approach, which follows a lateral pathway, may be considered for select patients with anatomical challenges, such as narrow pedicles or preexisting pedicle instrumentation.
conclusionCurrently, there is no clinical evidence to suggest the superiority of the extrapedicular approach over the traditional transpedicular approach. Each has its own anatomical considerations, technical challenges, and risks to consider, which require imaging guidance and careful adherence to anatomical landmarks. Further biomechanical, cadaveric, animal model, and clinical studies are warranted to assess the relative efficacy, safety, and long-term implications of each approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.