ArticleBMC palliative care2026
'Stay Curious': guest experiences of philosophical counselling in palliative care - a qualitative study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhilosophical counselling creates a dialogical space for exploring existential questions arising from serious illness, confrontation with mortality, bereavement, and caregiving. Although philosophy has long engaged with mortality and existential concerns, philosophy in form of philosophical counselling is not established in palliative care and has seldom been empirically studied. This study examines the views and experiences of individuals who engaged in philosophical counselling in palliative care-related contexts.
methodsNine counselling processes were completed; post-counselling interviews were obtained from eight guests and analysed. Purposive sampling identified practitioners via professional associations in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland; guests were recruited by these practitioners in naturalistic practice settings. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify categories and subthemes.
resultsThrough iterative, interpretive analysis, we generated four main categories: distinctive features of philosophical counselling; how guests perceived the philosophical practitioner; perceived effects; and strengths and limits. Participants valued freedom to explore open-ended questions without pressure to act or solve problems. Conversations were described as inspiring and created space for a "stepping out"-being seen as a person rather than only as affected. We interpreted philosophical curiosity as a grounding stance toward mortality. At the same time, critical questioning could become destabilizing, underscoring the need for calibrated movement between personal involvement and abstract reflection within an empathetic dialogical relationship.
conclusionsPhilosophical counselling seems to offer a space for reflective depth and existential inquiry in palliative care, fostering curiosity, wonder, and connectedness. It is described as offering intellectual freedom and an open, goal-free space. Practice implications include preserving this space, resisting help-driven agendas and didactic, overly abstract lecturing, and calibrating critical inquiry within empathetic dialogue. Philosophical counselling may contribute to facets of death literacy. Our findings indicate that end-of-life themes are already being addressed within philosophical counselling and offer guidance for introducing practice in palliative care contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.