Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374445›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2026

Physicians' attitudes and perceived diagnostic confidence in point-of-care ultrasound in gynecology and obstetrics (GO-POCUS): a prospective single-center implementation study with structured training.

Sebastian Griewing, Florian Gerber, Zoe S Oftring, Jonathan Bamberger, Alexandra Groß, Matthias Kalder, Malin Jansen, Corinna Keil, Johannes Knitza, Niklas Gremke and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sebastian GriewingDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Digital Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. s.griewing@uni-marburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5355-8903
Florian GerberDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Zoe S OftringDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Digital Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5473-2141
Jonathan BambergerDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Digital Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2160-6418
Alexandra GroßDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Matthias KalderDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Malin JansenDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Corinna KeilDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-1319
Johannes KnitzaDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Digital Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9192-4026
Niklas GremkeDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-3646
Uwe WagnerDepartment of Medicine, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Michael LeyerDepartment of Business Administration, Research Group for Digitalization and Process Management, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sebastian KuhnDepartment of Medicine, Institute for Digital Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-2973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care Ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly introduced in obstetrics and gynecology as a focused bedside extension of conventional ultrasound, although evidence on its implementation in routine care remains limited. This study examined physicians' attitudes towards POCUS, their perceived diagnostic confidence across different clinical scenarios, and their preference for POCUS compared with standard ultrasound devices. These outcomes were assessed during early implementation in routine care accompanied by structured training.

methodsIn this prospective, longitudinal implementation study, 22 physicians from a university department of gynecology and obstetrics evaluated standard ultrasound devices at baseline (T0a), completed a structured hands-on POCUS training, and assessed POCUS immediately after training (T0b) and after 2 weeks (T1), 1 month (T2), and 3 months (T3) of clinical use. Evaluations were conducted using repeated quantitative surveys. Outcomes were attitude (4 items, 7-point Likert), perceived diagnostic confidence in obstetric and gynecologic scenarios (17 items, 7-point Likert), and device preference (7-point Likert and dichotomous). Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, paired tests, mixed-effects models, and non-parametric sensitivity analyses.

resultsAttitude toward POCUS was significantly more favorable than attitude toward standard devices at baseline (T0a 3.69 vs. T0b 5.83; p < .001) and remained high throughout follow-up. Perceived diagnostic confidence for POCUS was not higher immediately after training but increased significantly over time in both obstetrics and gynecology after independent clinical use (both p < .001). Highest confidence was observed in focused bedside scenarios relevant to rapid orientation and immediate decision-making, including fetal vitality assessment, placental localization, amniotic fluid assessment, postvoid residual urine measurement, and urinary tract obstruction, whereas confidence remained lower for more complex applications such as cervical length assessment, Doppler-based examinations, and fetal growth restriction. Preference for POCUS was already high at baseline and remained stable over time.

conclusionsPOCUS showed high acceptance in gynecologic and obstetric care from early implementation to routine use. Its clinical relevance appears greatest for focused mobile use and rapid bedside decision-making. These findings were observed during early implementation and support the role of POCUS as a complement to comprehensive ultrasound. CLINICAL

trial registrationGerman Registry of Clinical Trials; registration number: DRKS 00036941; date of registration: July 16, 2025; title: GO-POCUS: Point-Of-Care UltraSound in Gynecology and Obstetrics: Attitude and Perceived Diagnostic Confidence among Physicians.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceGynecologyObstetricsPhysiciansPoint-of-Care SystemsAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancyProspective StudiesUltrasonographyGynecologyImplementation studyObstetricsPOCUSTechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID42374445
PMCPMC13321536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.