ArticleJournal of ovarian research2026
Temporal deep learning for 28-day mortality prediction in critically ill ovarian cancer patients: a multicenter development and validation study using hourly vital signs.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOvarian cancer patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission face particularly grave prognosis, yet current prognostic models rely on static baseline characteristics and generic severity scores, neglecting the rich temporal dynamics of vital signs that may better capture physiological deterioration patterns.
objectivesTo develop and validate an interpretable Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network integrating hourly vital signs and static features for predicting 28-day mortality in ICU-admitted ovarian cancer patients.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study utilized MIMIC-IV (2008-2022) and SICdb (2013-2021) databases. Adult ovarian cancer patients with first ICU admission, length of stay ≥ 24 h, and complete hourly measurements of six vital signs (blood pressures, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation) were included. MIMIC-IV was split into training (n = 269) and internal validation (n = 115) sets, while SICdb (n = 154) served as external validation. A dual-pathway LSTM network integrated temporal and static features (age, BMI, SOFA score). Model performance was assessed using AUROC, calibration metrics, and compared against traditional ICU scores and five static-only machine learning baselines. Five-fold cross-validation and 100 repeated temporal ablation trials assessed robustness. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis quantified feature importance and temporal dynamics.
resultsThe LSTM model achieved AUROC of 0.845 (95%CI: 0.789-0.901) in training, 0.785 (95%CI: 0.655-0.915) in internal validation, and 0.767 (95%CI: 0.617-0.917) in external validation, significantly outperforming SOFA (AUC: 0.683-0.733), SAPS II (AUC: 0.743), SAPS 3 (AUC: 0.678), and OASIS (AUC: 0.659 - 0.569). Five-fold cross-validation confirmed stability (mean AUROC: 0.785 ± 0.018). Negative predictive values exceeded 94% across all cohorts. The LSTM achieved AUC improvements of 0.10-0.17 over static baselines, with repeated permutation trials confirming significant temporal contributions (all P < 0.001). Temporal ablation identified the 12-24 h window as most critical (ΔAUC = 0.062). SHAP analysis revealed static features dominated prediction, while respiratory rate and diastolic blood pressure were leading temporal contributors.
conclusionsThis interpretable LSTM model accurately predicts mortality in ICU-admitted ovarian cancer patients by capturing temporal vital sign dynamics, significantly outperforming traditional severity scores and enabling personalized risk stratification for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.