ArticleBMC medical education2026
Admission test and academic outcomes in Italian dental education: a retrospective evaluation at the University of Turin.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdmission to dental programs in Italy has traditionally been regulated by a national entrance examination. However, a recent reform replaced this system with a merit-based assessment during a "filter semester." This study aimed to evaluate whether admission test scores predict academic success in the Dentistry programme at the University of Turin and to compare outcomes between students admitted through the standard process and those admitted via legal appeals.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 431 students enrolled between 2009 and 2018. In this context, CFUs are fully equivalent to ECTS (European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System) credits. Performance indicators included the accumulation of Crediti Formativi Universitari (CFUs; university credits equivalent to ECTS credits) during the first and second years, degree completion, and on-time graduation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, expressed as area under the curve (AUC), and logistic regression were used to assess the predictive power of entrance test scores.
resultsHigher admission test scores were associated with a greater likelihood of completing coursework and graduating on time. The test showed almost good predictive ability, particularly for first-year performance (AUC = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.65-0.75), total CFUs expected in Years I and II (AUC = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66-0.81), and degree attainment (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.67-0.75). A score of 40 (out of 90) was identified as the optimal cut-off for classifying "low" (< 40) and "good" (≥ 40) scores. Students below this threshold had an increased risk of not achieving the expected CFUs in Year I [OR = 5.04; 95% CI: 3.18-7.98], not completing all expected CFUs in Years I and II within the established timeframe [OR = 19.9; 95% CI: 2.72-146.0], and not graduating within six years [OR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.30-3.96].
conclusionThe admission test showed almost good predictive value for academic success in dentistry. Its elimination may have implications that warrant further evaluation, particularly in relation to attrition rates and resource allocation. These findings provide evidence to inform the ongoing debate on university admissions in Italy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.