ReviewMalaria journal2026
Mapping the intellectual landscape of malaria drug repurposing: a systematic analysis of the 51 most cited studies.
Review in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe escalating threat of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin-based therapies necessitates accelerated drug development. Drug repurposing offers a promising pathway to bypass the extensive time and cost of de novo discovery.
methodsThis study conducted a systematic analysis of the top 51 most cited original research articles in malaria drug repurposing identified from the Scopus database. Data on methodologies, drug candidates, targets, and outcomes were extracted and synthesized.
resultsThe analysis reveals a field dominated by computational approaches, with molecular docking (AutoDock Vina) and virtual screening serving as primary filters for identifying candidates from FDA-approved libraries. These methods are increasingly integrated with advanced techniques like machine learning for synergy prediction and transcriptomics-guided discovery. The repurposing landscape has identified promising antimalarial activity in diverse drug classes, including anticancer agents (methotrexate, lapatinib), antivirals (lopinavir, ritonavir), and immunosuppressants (everolimus). Key validated targets include the proteasome, PfHT1 glucose transporter, and various parasite enzymes. Candidates such as alisporivir, bazedoxifene, and nitrofurantoin have demonstrated efficacy in in vitro and in vivo models, often showing synergistic potential when combined with standard antimalarials.
conclusionThe convergence of computational power and biological insight has generated a rich pipeline of repurposable candidates. A quantitative analysis revealed molecular docking as the most frequent (31.4% of studies) and successful strategy, though in vivo preclinical evaluation yielded the highest validation score. Future success hinges on rigorous experimental validation, lead optimization, and advancing the most promising agents into clinical trials to address the urgent need for novel antimalarial therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.