ArticleBMC oral health2026
Exploring the challenges of a pilot dental services payment initiative: a qualitative policy analysis at an Iranian dental school.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPayment initiative in dental services is a key policy strategy to enhance access, affordability, and patient satisfaction. The Ghasedak project, a six-month pilot initiative at a university dental school in Iran, aimed to test a new payment model. This study analyzed the reasons for its suspension to draw lessons for future initiatives.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using Walt and Gilson's policy triangle framework. Data were collected in 2024 through 19 semi-structured interviews with project stakeholders (founders, managers, providers, and philanthropists) and 28 patients, selected via purposive sampling at Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj. Data were analyzed using the Elo and Kyngäs inductive content analysis approach in MAXQDA, consisting of preparation, organization, and reporting phases.
resultsFrom 145 initial codes, 13 themes and 61 subthemes were identified. Mapped to the policy triangle, barriers included: Context (management instability, lack of institutionalized inter-sectoral cooperation, insufficient upstream support); Content (lack of an independent and transparent structure, unsustainable funding, non-adherence to social work principles, and lack of continuity in service delivery); Process (administrative bureaucracy, decreased financial transparency, lack of service support); Actors (low patient satisfaction stemming from mistrust, lack of motivation of stakeholders, and unrealistic patient expectations).
conclusionsStructural, managerial, and operational deficiencies undermined the pilot's sustainability and impact. Strengthening future payment initiatives requires secure financing, coherent management, streamlined implementation, and genuine stakeholder engagement. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers seeking to design more resilient and effective dental payment initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.