ArticleBMC medical education2026
Mentorship perception and experience among pediatric surgical trainees: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMentorship is essential in surgical education and fosters professional growth, skill development, and career advancement. Despite its recognized importance, structured mentorship remains underdeveloped in pediatric surgical residency programs, particularly in small and specialized fields where limited faculty availability may restrict access to mentorship. This study aimed to measure mentorship prevalence, assess satisfaction, identify barriers to effective mentorship, and explore residents' preferences for structured mentorship models in the Saudi National Pediatric Surgery Residency Program.
methodsA cross sectional survey was distributed to all residents of the Saudi National Pediatric Surgery Residency Program. The 27 question survey assessed mentorship relationships, satisfaction, perceived benefits, communication preferences, and barriers. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsOf the 41 respondents (80% response rate), 60% were female, and 56% were under 30 years of age. Although 98% recognized the importance of mentorship, only 17 of 41 (41.5%) reported having a mentor. Key barriers included the absence of a structured mentorship program with clear objectives (61%), mentor time constraints (58.5%), and a lack of scheduled meetings (53.6%). Among mentored residents, 12 of 17 (70.5%) were satisfied, and 11 of 17 (64.7%) felt that their mentors provided strong skill development opportunities.
conclusionSignificant gaps exist between the perceived value and availability of mentorship in pediatric surgical residency programs. Formalized and structured mentorship programs with clear objectives and regular meetings are crucial for improving mentorship effectiveness. These findings support the development of more structured mentorship frameworks within pediatric surgery training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.