ArticleBMC public health2026
Predicting high perceived stress in late adolescence: development and validation of a prognostic model.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimStress levels have increased among adolescents, yet tools for identifying those at high risk remain limited. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a prognostic model estimating the probability of high perceived stress in young adulthood using data collected at age 15.
methodsData were from the West Jutland Cohort Study including 2,108 Danish adolescents with complete information on the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale at ages 15 and 18. High stress at age 18 was defined as a total score of 9 or higher. Twenty-three candidate predictors were examined using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression across 100 imputed datasets. Predictors selected in ≥ 80% of imputations were entered into a pooled logistic regression model. Model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation under multiple imputation. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and calibration with calibration-in-the-large (CITL) and slope.
resultsThree predictors at age 15 were retained: perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and self-esteem. The model showed good calibration (CITL = 0.003; slope = 1.008; expected-to-observed ratio = 0.998) and acceptable discrimination with an AUC = 0.72 (0.68;0.76). The Brier score was 0.081, indicating satisfactory overall predictive accuracy. The model showed high negative predictive values but modest positive predictive values.
conclusionsA simple model based on self-reported psychosocial measures in mid-adolescence predicted later high stress with good calibration and moderate discrimination. External validation is needed to assess generalisability and inform potential use as a low-burden decision-support tool in school health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.