Observational studyBMC oral health2026
Determination of caries risk of Finnish preschool-aged children and targeting prevention for at-risk individuals: a register-based pilot study.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePreventive dental care is an essential part of promoting children's oral health. The purpose of this retrospective register-based observational study was to find out whether caries risk and risk factors were individually assessed in children under school age, and whether the observed risk factors affected the recall intervals (RCs) and the implementation of preventive measures for at-risk patients.
methodsThe data consisted of patient records of Finnish children under school age (0-6 years) (n = 206) in oral health care and public maternity and child health clinics between 2014 and 2020. The children were born in 2014, 2016 and 2018 and lived in the City of Oulu, Finland. Data on different caries risk factors, preventive factors and measures, and RC intervals were registered for three different age groups (1-2-, 3-4- and 5-6-year-olds). Chi-squared and Fisher´s exact tests were used to evaluate registrations across three age groups.
resultsThe frequency of registering of different caries risk factors varied by age group (3.7-98.3%) and the assessing of individual caries risk in patient registers was inadequate (0-3.2%). RC intervals were not systematically determined based on individual risk; however, when recorded risk factors were considered, an increase in the number of factors was associated with a shortening of the RC intervals (p < 0.001). Prevention was not targeted toward caries-risk patients. Children in the age groups of 1-2-year-olds and 3-4-year-olds with ≥ 3 recorded risk indicators had a statistically significantly higher presence of caries lesions than others.
conclusionRegistering caries risk factors, identifying at-risk individuals and targeting prevention accordingly form the basis of good dental care for children. All oral health professionals should be better aware of and follow national recommendations and guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.