ArticleBMC oral health2026
Bridging the difficult talk: dentists' perception of a patient-centred communication aid to improve oral cancer early detection.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral cancer survival remains poor in Scotland, which is partly due to the delay of early detection. Patients' poor awareness contributes to such delays. Dentists often avoid raising the topic of oral cancer during routine check-ups, fearing patient anxiety. Question Prompt Lists (QPLs) may help by shifting the initiative to patients. This study explored dentists' perceived acceptability of using a QPL to facilitate oral cancer discussions in primary dental care.
methodsA pre-study patient focus group informed the design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 primary care dentists working in NHS Scotland. Purposive sampling was used to ensure variation in experience. Interview data were analysed using framework analysis informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA).
resultsDentists welcomed the QPL as a valuable, patient-centred tool that could fulfil their ethical duty to inform patients about oral cancer screening. However, significant concerns emerged around time constraints and staffing shortages within high-pressured NHS environments, making any additional intervention feel burdensome. For successful implementation, dentists suggested two prerequisites: (1) design optimisation using short, categorised design with simple language, and (2) systemic integration which was proposed to embed QPLs into booking systems with clear clinical guidelines and systematic training.
conclusionWhile dentists supported QPLs as an acceptable and ethical aid for opening difficult conversations about oral cancer, its successful implementation is contingent upon a user-friendly design of the tool and a systemic integration by addressing the fundamental structural inhibitors of NHS dentistry. Future interventions should focus on integrating QPLs into routine workflows rather than treating them as an add-on task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.